Aswan, Egypt: The Mystery of the Ostrich Egg

Today’s archaeology profession estimates the Pyramids of Giza to be about 4,600 years old. However, because the pyramids are made of stone, traditional dating methods using carbon-14 can’t be used to estimate their age. There really aren’t any good ways to determine when stone structures were built by examining the structures themselves – it is necessary to rely on organic material such as human remains found inside or near the structures.

In the case of the three major Giza pyramids, bodies were not found inside, and therefore the carbon-14 dating has relied on artifacts found on the surrounding plateau, such as remains of bread in a fire pit.  It’s a reasonable methodology, but it relies on the assumption that the pyramids were built at the same time as the village that surrounded them. However, what if the three large pyramids were built before the village? What if the village was built on top of something older which hasn’t been excavated yet?

Photo copyright by Jewel, 2017. All rights reserved.

What if the Pyramids of Giza are Older Than Believed?

However, perhaps a clue lies elsewhere to the age of the pyramids?

An ostrich egg was found in a tomb near Aswan that shows 3 triangular structures side by side. According to carbon dating methods, the human remains found in that same tomb were 7,000 years old. Therefore it is reasonable to think objects found in that tomb, including the egg, were equally old. Could the triangles etched on that presumably 7,000-year-old egg represent the pyramids of Giza? Some people think so, while others are skeptics. Alongside the triangles, there’s a marking that some people think could represent the Nile river and the Fayoum Oasis. But again, others are skeptics.

I haven’t seen any debate questioning that the egg itself is 7,000 years old. That seems to be accepted. The debate I’ve seen centers around what the drawing represents. Ie, does it represent the Giza pyramids, Nile River, and Fayoum Oasis as the theorists claim? Or does it represent something else?

The Meroitic Pyramids Theory and Why It Doesn’t Fit

Some skeptics have suggested that the 3 triangles might represent the Nubian pyramids of Sudan in the Meroitic kingdom of Kush. However, the Sudanese pyramids marked tombs, and were built much more recently (4,600 years ago) than the tomb the ostrich egg was found in (7,000 years ago).

The Nubian pyramids are also much farther south than where the egg was found, in what (during ancient times) would have been a different kingdom from the one governing the Aswan area where the egg was found.

Seeing the Egg for Yourself

Today, the ostrich egg resides in the Nubian Museum in Aswan, Egypt. I had the pleasure of seeing it firsthand myself on May 6, 2018 while I was in Aswan. It’s fascinating to look at this 7,000-year-old object and try to come up with alternate theories for what the image is showing.  So far, I keep coming back to the conclusion that maybe it does prove that the Pyramids of Giza are older than what mainstream archaeologists currently believe.

I look forward to seeing how future discoveries enhance our insight into the past.

4 thoughts on “Aswan, Egypt: The Mystery of the Ostrich Egg”

  1. Thanks for displaying the photo and info about the “Aswan Egg”. Do you know, or have photos that show what is carved on the top of the egg above the pyramids? Those etchings are somewhat stylized and although I agree with your comparative date assessment, the triangles do more closely resemble the steep sided Nubian Pyramids. However, does it appear to you that there is a much larger apex of a fourth pyramid behind the group of three? That could match Giza from a closeup perspective in front of the three small subsidiary pyramids with the larger Menkaure Pyramid behind. The latest age estimate of Khufu’s pyramid came from carbon dating of charcoal found in so-called mortar taken from joints between stones on the slope of the structure. The oldest dating, so far. There is an argument that the flow of energy from the Earth through and out the apex of the structure could influence (lengthen) the carbon-14 half-life, thereby yielding a much younger date, but that is considered on the fringe at this time. Finally, while regarding the intriguing interpretation of that portion of the egg as the Faiyum-Nile valley, and also considering the stylized nature, could the other etching simply be an ostrich?
    It would be great, if someone would carbon date the thing to get a more definitive answer. Even +/-120 years dating would yield comparative results. What do you and yours think? John H.

    1. John, thanks for your comments! The egg sits inside a glass display case, so it’s very difficult to see what the drawing above the 3 triangles might be. I tried to see it back when I was at that museum, but couldn’t get a good angle on it. I might try again when I return in April.

      You mentioned the Nubian pyramids of Sudan with their steeper angle. Have you ever seen photos of the pyramids at Deir el-Medina near Luxor Egypt? If not, you might enjoy having a look – here’s my blog entry about it:

  2. Hello Jewel,

    I found your post via google, good to have someone that agree on same point of view that Pyramids are much older.
    Unfortunately, I didn’t have the chance to visit Nubia museum, but I would like to ask for permissions to use this photo for ostrich egg in a research I’m doing , I will definitely credit you and your work while using this photo, Would be that possible ? .. also can I use one more picture for the egg, a bit to the left if you have one, so that all the pyramids appeared
    Please let me know if this okay with you.
    Super thanks !

    1. Hi Ahmed! I don’t have a photo that clearly shows all 3 pyramids. The egg sits inside a glass case at the museum. The egg position inside the glass makes it difficult to see the third pyramid. You may use the photo if you like, and yes, please do credit me. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *